Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Whirlpool's Response to Dooce: Customer Service via Twitter

Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

When Heather Armstrong's Whirpool washing machine broke down, she was yet another stay-at-home mom with an appliance problem. That is, until she logged onto her Twitter account, where over 1 million people have registered to follow each and every of her 140-character-or-less tweets.

Armstrong has run her popular blog, Dooce, since 2001, when she began writing about the single life and trappings of a real world job. But Armstrong's popularity ramped up considerably after marrying and having two daughters, to the point where dooce.com has become an easy way for family-friendly advertisers to reach tech-savvy women with buying power via the Internet.

So when Armstrong began advising her legions of Twitter followers against buying Maytag last week, it was a matter of hours before both Whirlpool Corp (they own Maytag) and The Home Depot's Twitter accounts were trying to contact her through responding tweets and phone calls.

 


Screenshot via Twitter - how's that for customer service?

Interestingly, by the end of the incident, Bosch, an uninvolved, competing appliance company ended up donating a washing machine and dryer to a shelter in Salt Lake City at Armstrong's request.
 


Bosch Appliances, not Whirlpool, ended up donating appliances after the Twitter incident.

That's when the focus of the story switches to Whirlpool and Bosch. Because Armstrong used her Twittersphere influence to complain about her Maytag machine, Jeff Piraino, manager of Whirpool's executive offices in Michigan, phoned Armstrong himself to coordinate the arrival of a new repairman (and yes, the machine got fixed). Through relatively little effort, the company was able to fix a problem with a blogger with potential to turn her readership's buying power elsewhere - all this took was a tweet and a few phone calls to get back into Armstrong's good graces.

In an age where tweeting is rapidly becoming the new word-of-mouth advertising, this public response should be considered a victory on Whirlpool's part. Intriguing though, is Bosch's position in the situation. Although Armstrong could have accepted the washer and dryer Bosch offered as a remedy to her broken Maytag model, she suggested they donate the appliances to a shelter. It was a good move by Bosch, which garnered the company attention without even having to remedy what was ultimately a problematic appliance complaint. You could ask, did they have an option at that point? In any case, the potential backlash against Armstrong for receiving special attention was neutralized, Whirlpool made an important customer happy, and another appliance corporation received a bit of buzz in the blogosphere for getting involved.

This all begs the question of whether or not this "problem" was a product of companies not quite knowing how to interact with customers through social media. Are corporations going to battle it out when a well-placed tweet endangers a brand reputation? Washing machines fail. It's a fact. And even if the customer happens to be a popular Internet figure, the truth is that there are hundreds of other people on the hotline waiting to hear word about their own appliances. Since the solution took relatively little effort - especially on Whirlpool's part - the situation was cleaned up nicely.

Ultimately, the responsibility of those in charge of maintaining a brand image comes in picking and choosing whether or not a consumer complaint has enough strength to be damaging.  In reality, many of such complaints rarely have a lasting impact, even if placed by someone like Armstrong. 

So if handling complaints through the traditional methods still seems to work, why is the company's Twitter account manager getting involved?

Branding through social media is a relatively new concept, and we can see how the dooce/Whirlpool/Bosch situation emphasizes the point that no one really knows what the solution is to handling unhappy consumers through Web-based applications. The trick is to recognize potential volatility of dealing with an angry, albeit influential, customer through social media applications. In many cases, a solution will not be as urgently needed as it might seem. Knowing what you are "listening to" in social media becomes vitally relevant.


Comments

As a consumer these complaints do have a cumulative effect. Having heard several complaints about the difficulty with getting Maytag service and their propensity to fail soon after purchase, as did Heather Armstrong's washer (10 days), I chose to buy another brand. People often disregard one negative story, but if they hear many about a brand they begin to listen.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:26 PM by Melissia
You aren't telling the full story about the traditional route. The traditional route is COMPLETELY unacceptable in a lot of cases, and dooce's was a doozy. 
 
The Maytag repairman was NOT sitting by the phone bored like that WKRP actor in the commercial; he came two different times after several days' wait, plus two different TEN DAY parts-ordering waits (he ordered the wrong parts the first time - at that point it had been over two weeks). It was a VERY expensive washer they had just bought, they had purchased the warranty, and the tweets were a last resort after yet another customer service agent was rude and unhelpful. Dooce was pushed to the edge before she tweeted. 
 
I'm glad she called Maytag/Whirlpool out on this. Customer Service is in shambles these days, especially with outsourcing, warranties are about as useful and understandable as a cell phone contract,and this company deserved the flap.
Posted @ Thursday, October 01, 2009 9:41 PM by becky
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics